https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329010 The Supreme Court allowed review because its earlier disposal of Civil Appeal No. 3135/2015 rested on an incorrect factual premise that the Revenue had not pursued the matter further. Subsequent information showed that an appeal before the CESTAT had in fact been filed and was pending. On that basis, the Court recalled its judgment dated 24.03.2015 and directed that the appeal be listed afresh for hearing before an appropriate Bench on the merits. en-us Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2016 12:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329010 The Supreme Court allowed review because its earlier disposal of Civil Appeal No. 3135/2015 rested on an incorrect factual premise that the Revenue had not pursued the matter further. Subsequent information showed that an appeal before the CESTAT had in fact been filed and was pending. On that basis, the Court recalled its judgment dated 24.03.2015 and directed that the appeal be listed afresh for hearing before an appropriate Bench on the merits. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329010