<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 718 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329009</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for rectification of mistake in the Final Order, emphasizing that the decision was made based on the legal position at the time and that the subsequent Supreme Court decision cited by the applicant did not apply. The Tribunal concluded that there was no error in its decision and clarified the scope of rectification under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 718 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329009</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for rectification of mistake in the Final Order, emphasizing that the decision was made based on the legal position at the time and that the subsequent Supreme Court decision cited by the applicant did not apply. The Tribunal concluded that there was no error in its decision and clarified the scope of rectification under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>