<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 716 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329007</link>
    <description>The valuation of processed grey fabrics was held unsustainable because it was based on balance-sheet figures from an unrelated year and on mechanical additions for freight, tax, insurance and commission. The assessee&#039;s work sheets with costing particulars were accepted, and no statutory requirement or Board guideline was shown to mandate CAS-4 certification for the period in dispute. As the lower appellate authority had already examined the record in detail and no material was produced to dislodge those findings, the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the assessable value failed and the duty demand, along with penalties, could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 716 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329007</link>
      <description>The valuation of processed grey fabrics was held unsustainable because it was based on balance-sheet figures from an unrelated year and on mechanical additions for freight, tax, insurance and commission. The assessee&#039;s work sheets with costing particulars were accepted, and no statutory requirement or Board guideline was shown to mandate CAS-4 certification for the period in dispute. As the lower appellate authority had already examined the record in detail and no material was produced to dislodge those findings, the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the assessable value failed and the duty demand, along with penalties, could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>