<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 714 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329005</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the decision to disallow cenvat credit due to missing details on invoices. Emphasizing the actual use of inputs and duty payment, the Tribunal held that technical deficiencies in invoices should not hinder credit if goods were used as intended. The judgment clarifies eligibility for cenvat credit, prioritizing substantive compliance over procedural errors in documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 714 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329005</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the decision to disallow cenvat credit due to missing details on invoices. Emphasizing the actual use of inputs and duty payment, the Tribunal held that technical deficiencies in invoices should not hinder credit if goods were used as intended. The judgment clarifies eligibility for cenvat credit, prioritizing substantive compliance over procedural errors in documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>