<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 713 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329004</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance of cenvat credit on disputed goods used as inputs for manufacturing capital goods under Chapter 84. The disputed goods were deemed eligible as capital goods for cenvat credit, and the Tribunal ruled in favor of allowing the credit. The issue of taking 100% cenvat credit in a different financial year was remanded for further verification and adjudication by the original authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 13:16:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 713 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329004</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance of cenvat credit on disputed goods used as inputs for manufacturing capital goods under Chapter 84. The disputed goods were deemed eligible as capital goods for cenvat credit, and the Tribunal ruled in favor of allowing the credit. The issue of taking 100% cenvat credit in a different financial year was remanded for further verification and adjudication by the original authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>