<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 710 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329001</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the restoration of an appeal and condoned the delay, emphasizing the need for justice for both parties. The appellant, alleged to be an abettor in a previous Customs Appeal, faced penalties due to absence and lack of adjournment requests. The Tribunal granted the appellant an opportunity to present their case to prevent any miscarriage of justice, directing the Registry to schedule the stay application hearing. The Tribunal stressed the importance of proper case listing to avoid oversights in revenue-related matters, ultimately setting the appeal back to its original status for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 13:05:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 710 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329001</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the restoration of an appeal and condoned the delay, emphasizing the need for justice for both parties. The appellant, alleged to be an abettor in a previous Customs Appeal, faced penalties due to absence and lack of adjournment requests. The Tribunal granted the appellant an opportunity to present their case to prevent any miscarriage of justice, directing the Registry to schedule the stay application hearing. The Tribunal stressed the importance of proper case listing to avoid oversights in revenue-related matters, ultimately setting the appeal back to its original status for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>