<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1295 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183733</link>
    <description>The High Court acknowledged the Revision filed by the Department against the orders of the Appellate Authority regarding the non-execution of re-shipment orders for seized gold. The Court directed the petitioners to appear before the Revisional Authority for review within eight weeks. Emphasizing compliance with the Revisional process, the Court closed the Writ Petitions without awarding costs, emphasizing the importance of timely resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 13:01:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1295 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183733</link>
      <description>The High Court acknowledged the Revision filed by the Department against the orders of the Appellate Authority regarding the non-execution of re-shipment orders for seized gold. The Court directed the petitioners to appear before the Revisional Authority for review within eight weeks. Emphasizing compliance with the Revisional process, the Court closed the Writ Petitions without awarding costs, emphasizing the importance of timely resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>