https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183735 The Tribunal held in favor of the appellants, allowing their appeal and setting aside the impugned order. It was established that the duty paid on ethanol was indeed a duty of excise, and the denial of credit based on the absence of duty payable on the goods was incorrect. The Tribunal emphasized the validity of the duty paid on ethanol through proper invoices and ruled that the appellants were entitled to avail CENVAT credit on duty paid on ethanol purchased from various suppliers. en-us Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jun 2016 13:01:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183735 The Tribunal held in favor of the appellants, allowing their appeal and setting aside the impugned order. It was established that the duty paid on ethanol was indeed a duty of excise, and the denial of credit based on the absence of duty payable on the goods was incorrect. The Tribunal emphasized the validity of the duty paid on ethanol through proper invoices and ruled that the appellants were entitled to avail CENVAT credit on duty paid on ethanol purchased from various suppliers. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183735