https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328992 The court dismissed the petitions, finding that the notice under section 148 was issued within the prescribed time limit and that the Assessing Officer had recorded reasons before issuing the notice. The court emphasized that such disputed factual questions are not suitable for examination in a writ petition, especially at the notice stage, and should be addressed through the appropriate tax appeals process. en-us Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 May 2017 17:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328992 The court dismissed the petitions, finding that the notice under section 148 was issued within the prescribed time limit and that the Assessing Officer had recorded reasons before issuing the notice. The court emphasized that such disputed factual questions are not suitable for examination in a writ petition, especially at the notice stage, and should be addressed through the appropriate tax appeals process. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328992