<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Market Development Expenses Classified as Revenue, Not Capital, Due to Lack of Enduring Benefit: Key Contractual Insights.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29819</link>
    <description>Disallowance of market development expenses - revenue v/s capital - looking to the tenure of the contract, right of termination with the parties and conditions attached on termination of the contract , it does not suggest in any manner that assessee has acquired any benefit which is of enduing nature except the services. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:58:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:58:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Market Development Expenses Classified as Revenue, Not Capital, Due to Lack of Enduring Benefit: Key Contractual Insights.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29819</link>
      <description>Disallowance of market development expenses - revenue v/s capital - looking to the tenure of the contract, right of termination with the parties and conditions attached on termination of the contract , it does not suggest in any manner that assessee has acquired any benefit which is of enduing nature except the services. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:58:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>