<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 699 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328990</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act and the preliminary order for reassessment proceedings. The court held that since no claim was made under section 80IB and the foundation for reopening the assessment was flawed, the notice was bad in law. The petition was allowed, and the notice and preliminary order were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:59:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 699 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328990</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act and the preliminary order for reassessment proceedings. The court held that since no claim was made under section 80IB and the foundation for reopening the assessment was flawed, the notice was bad in law. The petition was allowed, and the notice and preliminary order were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>