https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183725 The Revenue's appeal against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 11,75,658/- made on account of suppressed production of mung dal for the assessment year 2002-03 was dismissed. The CIT(A) and Tribunal both found the AO's methodology flawed, supporting the assessee's explanation with evidence from day-to-day quantity details and certifications. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s well-reasoned order, noting past deletions of similar additions. Ultimately, the Tribunal found no valid ground for interference and affirmed the CIT(A)'s decision. en-us Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:31:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183725 The Revenue's appeal against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 11,75,658/- made on account of suppressed production of mung dal for the assessment year 2002-03 was dismissed. The CIT(A) and Tribunal both found the AO's methodology flawed, supporting the assessee's explanation with evidence from day-to-day quantity details and certifications. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s well-reasoned order, noting past deletions of similar additions. Ultimately, the Tribunal found no valid ground for interference and affirmed the CIT(A)'s decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183725