<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 64 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3870</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, directing the refund of Rs.3,72,605.70 to be paid to the appellants instead of being credited to the consumer welfare fund. The tribunal found that the burden of proof was discharged by the appellants as they had not passed on the duty incidence to their customers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 64 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3870</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, directing the refund of Rs.3,72,605.70 to be paid to the appellants instead of being credited to the consumer welfare fund. The tribunal found that the burden of proof was discharged by the appellants as they had not passed on the duty incidence to their customers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>