https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3869 The Tribunal upheld the decision that the vessel, despite seeking permission for coastal operations, was considered a coastal vessel during its stay in an Indian port. As the vessel did not engage in carrying goods or passengers, it was not deemed a foreign-going vessel eligible for duty-free consumption of ship stores. Consequently, the appeal for a refund of duty paid on ship stores was rejected by the Tribunal in a judgment pronounced on 6-12-2007. en-us Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3869 The Tribunal upheld the decision that the vessel, despite seeking permission for coastal operations, was considered a coastal vessel during its stay in an Indian port. As the vessel did not engage in carrying goods or passengers, it was not deemed a foreign-going vessel eligible for duty-free consumption of ship stores. Consequently, the appeal for a refund of duty paid on ship stores was rejected by the Tribunal in a judgment pronounced on 6-12-2007. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3869