<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1331 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal disallowed various deductions claimed under the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to non-compliance with statutory conditions. The claims for deductions related to death-cum-retirement gratuity, pension liability from the Salt Department, contributions received from the Salt Department, revenue expenditure on pension, interest on pension fund, interest paid on gratuity fund, Provident Fund amount, and contribution to recognized Provident Fund kept in the Post Office were rejected. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the assessee failed to meet the specific legal criteria required for the deductions, resulting in the claims being disallowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 15:44:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1331 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal disallowed various deductions claimed under the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to non-compliance with statutory conditions. The claims for deductions related to death-cum-retirement gratuity, pension liability from the Salt Department, contributions received from the Salt Department, revenue expenditure on pension, interest on pension fund, interest paid on gratuity fund, Provident Fund amount, and contribution to recognized Provident Fund kept in the Post Office were rejected. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the assessee failed to meet the specific legal criteria required for the deductions, resulting in the claims being disallowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>