<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 748 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183702</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC admitted the case where the assessee did not appear. Two questions of law on interest income from Fixed Deposit Receipts for export performance were framed. The court ruled in favor of the revenue based on precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:54:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 748 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183702</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC admitted the case where the assessee did not appear. Two questions of law on interest income from Fixed Deposit Receipts for export performance were framed. The court ruled in favor of the revenue based on precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>