<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 681 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328972</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for a refund of service tax paid on various input services used for exported services. The Tribunal emphasized the interpretation of &#039;activities related to business&#039; within the pre-2011 definition of input services and the need to establish a nexus between input and output services. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal set aside the previous rejection, allowing the refund for specific services and clarifying the eligibility criteria for such refunds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 681 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328972</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for a refund of service tax paid on various input services used for exported services. The Tribunal emphasized the interpretation of &#039;activities related to business&#039; within the pre-2011 definition of input services and the need to establish a nexus between input and output services. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal set aside the previous rejection, allowing the refund for specific services and clarifying the eligibility criteria for such refunds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>