<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 677 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328968</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalties imposed for delay in payment of service tax. The appellant&#039;s prompt payment upon discovery precluded the issuance of a show cause notice under Section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994. The tribunal found the penalties not legally sustainable, confirming only the demand for service tax and interest. The appeal was partly allowed with consequential reliefs, if any.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 677 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328968</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalties imposed for delay in payment of service tax. The appellant&#039;s prompt payment upon discovery precluded the issuance of a show cause notice under Section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994. The tribunal found the penalties not legally sustainable, confirming only the demand for service tax and interest. The appeal was partly allowed with consequential reliefs, if any.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>