<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 672 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328963</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld the decision of the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) in a case concerning Central Excise Duty calculation. The Tribunal ruled that transport expenditure of bare pipes from the appellant&#039;s premises to the job worker&#039;s premises should not be added to the assessable value for duty calculation. It was determined that Rule 5 did not apply as the goods were removed for job work, not subsequent sale, and the duty payment based on contract price was deemed lawful, eliminating the need for additional freight charges. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 10:39:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 672 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328963</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld the decision of the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) in a case concerning Central Excise Duty calculation. The Tribunal ruled that transport expenditure of bare pipes from the appellant&#039;s premises to the job worker&#039;s premises should not be added to the assessable value for duty calculation. It was determined that Rule 5 did not apply as the goods were removed for job work, not subsequent sale, and the duty payment based on contract price was deemed lawful, eliminating the need for additional freight charges. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>