<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 671 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328962</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s Appeal, setting aside the direction for refund due to the lack of evidence regarding the payment of interest liability. The case emphasizes the significance of providing substantiated evidence to support claims during legal proceedings for accurate judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 10:39:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 671 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328962</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s Appeal, setting aside the direction for refund due to the lack of evidence regarding the payment of interest liability. The case emphasizes the significance of providing substantiated evidence to support claims during legal proceedings for accurate judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>