https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328959 Core spun yarn in which drafted cotton roving and Lycra filament emerge as a single yarn with Lycra as the core was treated as classifiable under sub-heading 5205.11, not 5205.90. The Tribunal relied on an earlier coordinate bench decision involving the same material and applied judicial discipline by following that precedent. The manufacturing process and the prior ruling together supported classification under sub-heading 5205.11, and the appellant's alternative classification was rejected. en-us Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jun 2016 10:39:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328959 Core spun yarn in which drafted cotton roving and Lycra filament emerge as a single yarn with Lycra as the core was treated as classifiable under sub-heading 5205.11, not 5205.90. The Tribunal relied on an earlier coordinate bench decision involving the same material and applied judicial discipline by following that precedent. The manufacturing process and the prior ruling together supported classification under sub-heading 5205.11, and the appellant's alternative classification was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328959