https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183695 A consumer complaint seeking regularisation of an LPG connection failed where there was no privity of contract and no valid subscription voucher establishing an authorised customer relationship. The distributor was described as acting on a principal-to-principal basis, so possession of cylinders or supply alone could not compel a contract on the corporation. An unauthorised connection released by the distributor also did not amount to deficiency in service by the corporation, because deficiency requires a fault in a service undertaken by the party complained against. The claim against the corporation was therefore unsustainable. en-us Tue, 07 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jun 2016 10:30:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183695 A consumer complaint seeking regularisation of an LPG connection failed where there was no privity of contract and no valid subscription voucher establishing an authorised customer relationship. The distributor was described as acting on a principal-to-principal basis, so possession of cylinders or supply alone could not compel a contract on the corporation. An unauthorised connection released by the distributor also did not amount to deficiency in service by the corporation, because deficiency requires a fault in a service undertaken by the party complained against. The claim against the corporation was therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183695