<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 660 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328951</link>
    <description>Fuel injection pumps exported and later incorporated into diesel engine assemblies abroad did not retain the separate identity required for re-importation exemption under Notification No. 94/96-Cus. The exemption applied only to the same goods previously exported, and goods cleared as part of imported engines could not be treated as re-imported pumps. On that basis, the notification condition was not satisfied and the exemption claim was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 10:23:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 660 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328951</link>
      <description>Fuel injection pumps exported and later incorporated into diesel engine assemblies abroad did not retain the separate identity required for re-importation exemption under Notification No. 94/96-Cus. The exemption applied only to the same goods previously exported, and goods cleared as part of imported engines could not be treated as re-imported pumps. On that basis, the notification condition was not satisfied and the exemption claim was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>