<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 62 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3863</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the decision allowing abatement of octroi and cash refund, citing the absence of actual payment of octroi by the assessee. The application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment to refunds from finalization of provisional assessments was also clarified, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 62 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3863</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the decision allowing abatement of octroi and cash refund, citing the absence of actual payment of octroi by the assessee. The application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment to refunds from finalization of provisional assessments was also clarified, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>