<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 61 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3861</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake, finding no error apparent on the face of the order. However, in light of successful challenges against the Commissioner (Appeals) orders, the Tribunal recalled the earlier order dated 28-5-2007 to ensure substantial justice. The appeal was restored for hearing, emphasizing the importance of serving justice despite technicalities and addressing changes in circumstances resulting from the successful challenges against the orders granting the refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 61 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3861</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake, finding no error apparent on the face of the order. However, in light of successful challenges against the Commissioner (Appeals) orders, the Tribunal recalled the earlier order dated 28-5-2007 to ensure substantial justice. The appeal was restored for hearing, emphasizing the importance of serving justice despite technicalities and addressing changes in circumstances resulting from the successful challenges against the orders granting the refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>