<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 642 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328933</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the interpretation of section 40(a)(ic) for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) deduction, exclusion of prior period expenditure, and Security Transaction Tax (STT) from book profit computation under section 115JB. The Court affirmed that FBT is deductible for book profit calculation despite being prohibited for regular income computation. It supported the exclusion of prior period expenditure and STT based on legal provisions, emphasizing that these exclusions were correctly applied and not subject to rectification. The Court found no substantial question of law and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 642 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328933</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the interpretation of section 40(a)(ic) for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) deduction, exclusion of prior period expenditure, and Security Transaction Tax (STT) from book profit computation under section 115JB. The Court affirmed that FBT is deductible for book profit calculation despite being prohibited for regular income computation. It supported the exclusion of prior period expenditure and STT based on legal provisions, emphasizing that these exclusions were correctly applied and not subject to rectification. The Court found no substantial question of law and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>