<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1540 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183693</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decisions of the Learned CITA on both issues. The addition made towards a discrepancy in expenses and the deletion of an addition on account of bogus creditors were both affirmed. The tribunal emphasized that the nature of transactions should prevail over nomenclature in books of accounts, ruling that section 194H applies only in principal-to-agent relationships.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 18:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1540 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183693</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decisions of the Learned CITA on both issues. The addition made towards a discrepancy in expenses and the deletion of an addition on account of bogus creditors were both affirmed. The tribunal emphasized that the nature of transactions should prevail over nomenclature in books of accounts, ruling that section 194H applies only in principal-to-agent relationships.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>