<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 637 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328928</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reassessment proceedings under Section 147, rejecting the assessee&#039;s argument of &quot;change of opinion.&quot; However, on the issue of the deduction under Section 10B, the Tribunal found that the AO had used incorrect figures and remanded the matter back to the AO for recalculating the deduction using the correct formula as per Section 10B(4). The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 08:39:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 637 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328928</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reassessment proceedings under Section 147, rejecting the assessee&#039;s argument of &quot;change of opinion.&quot; However, on the issue of the deduction under Section 10B, the Tribunal found that the AO had used incorrect figures and remanded the matter back to the AO for recalculating the deduction using the correct formula as per Section 10B(4). The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>