<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 842 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183670</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by revenue under section 35-G of the Central Excise Act against the Tribunal&#039;s order was dismissed. The Tribunal&#039;s factual findings indicated consistent input usage in manufacturing goods with no evidence of alternate sources. The judgment affirmed the firm findings of input usage in the final product, leading to the dismissal of the appeal due to the absence of grounds for admission and lack of legal questions for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 18:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 842 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183670</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by revenue under section 35-G of the Central Excise Act against the Tribunal&#039;s order was dismissed. The Tribunal&#039;s factual findings indicated consistent input usage in manufacturing goods with no evidence of alternate sources. The judgment affirmed the firm findings of input usage in the final product, leading to the dismissal of the appeal due to the absence of grounds for admission and lack of legal questions for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>