https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183668 The High Court dismissed 21 revenue appeals challenging a Tribunal order under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal's decision, based on consistent precedents, found no evidence of alternative input sources in goods manufacturing. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing the importance of decision consistency. It concluded that no substantial legal questions existed, as inputs were used in the final product without proof of alternative supply methods. The judgment highlighted factual findings and revenue's acceptance of prior orders, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. en-us Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183668 The High Court dismissed 21 revenue appeals challenging a Tribunal order under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal's decision, based on consistent precedents, found no evidence of alternative input sources in goods manufacturing. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing the importance of decision consistency. It concluded that no substantial legal questions existed, as inputs were used in the final product without proof of alternative supply methods. The judgment highlighted factual findings and revenue's acceptance of prior orders, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183668