<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 774 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183667</link>
    <description>Classification of &quot;Himtaj Tel&quot; was determined by prior precedent treating &quot;Himtaj Oil&quot; as falling under Tariff Item 30.03. The Supreme Court followed that earlier view and held that the product is classifiable under Tariff Item 30.03, not Tariff Item 33.05. The appeals therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:22:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 774 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183667</link>
      <description>Classification of &quot;Himtaj Tel&quot; was determined by prior precedent treating &quot;Himtaj Oil&quot; as falling under Tariff Item 30.03. The Supreme Court followed that earlier view and held that the product is classifiable under Tariff Item 30.03, not Tariff Item 33.05. The appeals therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>