<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 622 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328913</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, permitting the availment of Cenvat credit before registration and treating the gross amount as inclusive of service tax. The show cause notice was deemed valid, and the extended limitation period was applicable. The penalty under Section 78 was set aside, while penalties under Sections 76 and 77 were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 622 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328913</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, permitting the availment of Cenvat credit before registration and treating the gross amount as inclusive of service tax. The show cause notice was deemed valid, and the extended limitation period was applicable. The penalty under Section 78 was set aside, while penalties under Sections 76 and 77 were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>