https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328907 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in a case concerning denial of CENVAT credit due to Bill of Entry being in the name of principal manufacturers. The appellant, a job-work basis manufacturer, argued that Circular provisions allowed credit on endorsed Bill of Entry without Customs Officer endorsement. The Tribunal agreed, emphasizing that importer's endorsement sufficed for credit availing purposes as per the Circular, setting aside the impugned orders and allowing the appeals on 13.04.2016. en-us Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328907 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in a case concerning denial of CENVAT credit due to Bill of Entry being in the name of principal manufacturers. The appellant, a job-work basis manufacturer, argued that Circular provisions allowed credit on endorsed Bill of Entry without Customs Officer endorsement. The Tribunal agreed, emphasizing that importer's endorsement sufficed for credit availing purposes as per the Circular, setting aside the impugned orders and allowing the appeals on 13.04.2016. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328907