<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 610 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328901</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was admissible on CHA, port, and warehousing/storage services used up to the port of export because, in export transactions, the place of removal extends to the export port and such services remain within that limit. A Board circular was also read as clarifying that the port of export is the place of removal for exports, supporting credit eligibility. Since the amount was deposited during the pendency of the proceedings and the credit was found admissible, the deposit became refundable and the refund claim was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 610 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328901</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was admissible on CHA, port, and warehousing/storage services used up to the port of export because, in export transactions, the place of removal extends to the export port and such services remain within that limit. A Board circular was also read as clarifying that the port of export is the place of removal for exports, supporting credit eligibility. Since the amount was deposited during the pendency of the proceedings and the credit was found admissible, the deposit became refundable and the refund claim was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>