<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 609 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328900</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the imposition of penalty under Section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the allowance of Cenvat credit on polyester film used in manufacturing pouches, resulting in a lower duty liability and penalty amount. The Tribunal emphasized that the penalty should be based on the duty liability after considering Cenvat credit, in line with established legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:57:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 609 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328900</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the imposition of penalty under Section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the allowance of Cenvat credit on polyester film used in manufacturing pouches, resulting in a lower duty liability and penalty amount. The Tribunal emphasized that the penalty should be based on the duty liability after considering Cenvat credit, in line with established legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>