<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 605 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328896</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant is entitled to the sanctioned rebate claim without any reduction for interest. It deemed the appropriation of interest against the rebate claim as not legal or proper, especially in light of the previous decision allowing the refund of the disputed credit amount. The appeal was allowed, and consequential reliefs were granted to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:57:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 605 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328896</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant is entitled to the sanctioned rebate claim without any reduction for interest. It deemed the appropriation of interest against the rebate claim as not legal or proper, especially in light of the previous decision allowing the refund of the disputed credit amount. The appeal was allowed, and consequential reliefs were granted to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>