<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 604 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328895</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as the refund amount of Rs. 18,365 fell below the specified threshold of Rs. 50,000 under the Second proviso to Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and the Tribunal&#039;s discretionary power to determine appeal admissibility based on financial thresholds set by law, without considering the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 604 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328895</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as the refund amount of Rs. 18,365 fell below the specified threshold of Rs. 50,000 under the Second proviso to Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and the Tribunal&#039;s discretionary power to determine appeal admissibility based on financial thresholds set by law, without considering the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>