<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 596 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328887</link>
    <description>The High Court held in favor of the appellant-assessee, ruling against the Revenue&#039;s disallowance of remuneration paid to directors under Section 40A(2) of the Income Tax Act. The court found that the remuneration, taxed at 30% for both the company and directors, resulted in revenue neutrality. The court concluded that taxing the same income in both hands would lead to double taxation, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and allowing the Tax Appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 596 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328887</link>
      <description>The High Court held in favor of the appellant-assessee, ruling against the Revenue&#039;s disallowance of remuneration paid to directors under Section 40A(2) of the Income Tax Act. The court found that the remuneration, taxed at 30% for both the company and directors, resulted in revenue neutrality. The court concluded that taxing the same income in both hands would lead to double taxation, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and allowing the Tax Appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>