<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 593 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328884</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, overturning the disallowance of depreciation under Section 43(1) Explanation-3. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting tax avoidance motives and the revenue-neutral nature of asset reclassification for depreciation purposes. The Tribunal emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to establish the primary purpose of the asset transfer as tax liability reduction, as required by Explanation 3 to Section 43(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:11:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 593 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328884</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, overturning the disallowance of depreciation under Section 43(1) Explanation-3. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting tax avoidance motives and the revenue-neutral nature of asset reclassification for depreciation purposes. The Tribunal emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to establish the primary purpose of the asset transfer as tax liability reduction, as required by Explanation 3 to Section 43(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>