<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 592 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328883</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for the assessment year (A.Y.) 2009-10, treating a portion of software license fees as revenue expenditure and the rest as capital expenditure. The foreign exchange loss disallowed by the Assessing Officer was allowed following the Supreme Court decision. For A.Y. 2005-06, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, considering software expenses as revenue expenditure. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2009-10 was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:11:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 592 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328883</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for the assessment year (A.Y.) 2009-10, treating a portion of software license fees as revenue expenditure and the rest as capital expenditure. The foreign exchange loss disallowed by the Assessing Officer was allowed following the Supreme Court decision. For A.Y. 2005-06, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, considering software expenses as revenue expenditure. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2009-10 was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>