<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1202 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183642</link>
    <description>Failure to comply with a stay order directing pre-deposit led the Tribunal to dismiss the appeals for non-compliance. The appellants did not make the required deposit within the stipulated period and also did not seek extension of the stay order. As no compliance was shown, the Tribunal closed all the connected appeals on that ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:43:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1202 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183642</link>
      <description>Failure to comply with a stay order directing pre-deposit led the Tribunal to dismiss the appeals for non-compliance. The appellants did not make the required deposit within the stipulated period and also did not seek extension of the stay order. As no compliance was shown, the Tribunal closed all the connected appeals on that ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>