<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1291 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183646</link>
    <description>The Tribunal declined to refer the conflict on cash discount deduction to a five Members Bench, allowing the appellant to pursue the appeal on its merits before the regular Bench. This decision was based on existing binding decisions, indicating that further escalation was unnecessary. The case underscores the importance of resolving legal conflicts to ensure fair outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:43:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1291 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183646</link>
      <description>The Tribunal declined to refer the conflict on cash discount deduction to a five Members Bench, allowing the appellant to pursue the appeal on its merits before the regular Bench. This decision was based on existing binding decisions, indicating that further escalation was unnecessary. The case underscores the importance of resolving legal conflicts to ensure fair outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>