<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1105 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183640</link>
    <description>The High Court held that marking copies of the show-cause notice to partners was sufficient, partners remained liable for service tax even after firm dissolution, and the extended period for notice was applicable. Partners&#039; joint and several liability under the Partnership Act was emphasized, rejecting claims of insufficient notice and time-bar. The court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming partners&#039; responsibilities and Department&#039;s lack of prior knowledge of tax evasion by the firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1105 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183640</link>
      <description>The High Court held that marking copies of the show-cause notice to partners was sufficient, partners remained liable for service tax even after firm dissolution, and the extended period for notice was applicable. Partners&#039; joint and several liability under the Partnership Act was emphasized, rejecting claims of insufficient notice and time-bar. The court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming partners&#039; responsibilities and Department&#039;s lack of prior knowledge of tax evasion by the firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>