<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1330 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183634</link>
    <description>Government service status could not be altered or extinguished without authority of law, and Article 207 of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Service Regulations applied only to pensionary consequences on abolition of a permanent post. The appellants&#039; Government posts were not shown to have been validly abolished, and no statutory rule, valid instrument, or effective appointment by the Company established a transfer into separate company service. The Court also rejected delay and laches because the challenge arose from later orders denying parity after continuing treatment as Government employees. The impugned orders were quashed and service parity restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1330 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183634</link>
      <description>Government service status could not be altered or extinguished without authority of law, and Article 207 of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Service Regulations applied only to pensionary consequences on abolition of a permanent post. The appellants&#039; Government posts were not shown to have been validly abolished, and no statutory rule, valid instrument, or effective appointment by the Company established a transfer into separate company service. The Court also rejected delay and laches because the challenge arose from later orders denying parity after continuing treatment as Government employees. The impugned orders were quashed and service parity restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>