https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183630 A supersession order against a municipal corporation was examined on the validity of multiple statutory grounds under the notice and order. The first ground, relating to alleged financial mismanagement, failed because the corporation was not given proper notice of the specific charge and the factual basis was insufficient. The second ground, concerning failure to improve water supply and provide adequate suitable water, was supported by the materials and constituted a relevant statutory basis. The governing principle stated is that an administrative or quasi-judicial order based on several grounds remains sustainable if at least one legally relevant and supported ground is sufficient and the defective ground would not have altered the final decision. en-us Thu, 02 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:14:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183630 A supersession order against a municipal corporation was examined on the validity of multiple statutory grounds under the notice and order. The first ground, relating to alleged financial mismanagement, failed because the corporation was not given proper notice of the specific charge and the factual basis was insufficient. The second ground, concerning failure to improve water supply and provide adequate suitable water, was supported by the materials and constituted a relevant statutory basis. The governing principle stated is that an administrative or quasi-judicial order based on several grounds remains sustainable if at least one legally relevant and supported ground is sufficient and the defective ground would not have altered the final decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183630