<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 69 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3844</link>
    <description>Supply of manpower for packing, loading and unloading cement bags was treated as manpower assistance rather than cargo handling service because the workers only assisted the process and did not control the cargo handling operation. On that classification dispute, the demand failed. Since the issue was one of legal interpretation of service classification, the extended period of limitation, interest and penalties were also not sustainable. The impugned demand was therefore set aside, granting the assessee consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 69 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3844</link>
      <description>Supply of manpower for packing, loading and unloading cement bags was treated as manpower assistance rather than cargo handling service because the workers only assisted the process and did not control the cargo handling operation. On that classification dispute, the demand failed. Since the issue was one of legal interpretation of service classification, the extended period of limitation, interest and penalties were also not sustainable. The impugned demand was therefore set aside, granting the assessee consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>