https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183626 A disciplinary authority cannot invoke Rule 25 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968 to order a further inquiry on the same material after the inquiry authority has exonerated the employee, unless there is a demonstrated defect in the first inquiry, denial of opportunity, or perversity in the findings. Where the remit is made after the authority independently records adverse findings on the existing record, the process amounts to a second inquiry on the same charges and is impermissible. On these facts, the remit was invalid, though the dismissal order itself was not interfered with. en-us Wed, 08 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:41:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183626 A disciplinary authority cannot invoke Rule 25 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968 to order a further inquiry on the same material after the inquiry authority has exonerated the employee, unless there is a demonstrated defect in the first inquiry, denial of opportunity, or perversity in the findings. Where the remit is made after the authority independently records adverse findings on the existing record, the process amounts to a second inquiry on the same charges and is impermissible. On these facts, the remit was invalid, though the dismissal order itself was not interfered with. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183626