<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 512 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183622</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s liability to pay service tax on the use of raw materials in photographic services and the development of photographic films. The appellant was directed to comply with payment terms and make a pre-deposit to avoid penalties and recovery actions. The Tribunal found that the appellant failed to provide evidence of studios&#039; tax payments in the second issue, leading to the decision to uphold the liability for service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:42:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 512 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183622</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s liability to pay service tax on the use of raw materials in photographic services and the development of photographic films. The appellant was directed to comply with payment terms and make a pre-deposit to avoid penalties and recovery actions. The Tribunal found that the appellant failed to provide evidence of studios&#039; tax payments in the second issue, leading to the decision to uphold the liability for service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>