<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1329 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183620</link>
    <description>Petitioner-members were directed to pursue the appellate remedy before the Tribunal, and appeals filed within the stipulated period were protected from limitation objections. Interim protection against coercive recovery was continued until the Tribunal decided the stay applications, preserving the petitioners&#039; position pending tribunal consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:24:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1329 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183620</link>
      <description>Petitioner-members were directed to pursue the appellate remedy before the Tribunal, and appeals filed within the stipulated period were protected from limitation objections. Interim protection against coercive recovery was continued until the Tribunal decided the stay applications, preserving the petitioners&#039; position pending tribunal consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>