<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (6) TMI 129 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183621</link>
    <description>The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is treated as a statutory minimum-benefit regime that overrides inconsistent awards, settlements and schemes, while preserving more favourable employee benefits. Gratuity is computed on 15 actual working days&#039; wages for each qualifying completed year, not on a reduced 13-day basis or a 26-day month. Eligibility depends on the statutory definition of continuous service for each year claimed, and re-employment cases remain covered where service ends after the Act came into force. Authorities may condone delay on sufficient cause, and prior payment of a lesser amount does not bar recovery of the statutory balance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:24:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (6) TMI 129 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183621</link>
      <description>The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is treated as a statutory minimum-benefit regime that overrides inconsistent awards, settlements and schemes, while preserving more favourable employee benefits. Gratuity is computed on 15 actual working days&#039; wages for each qualifying completed year, not on a reduced 13-day basis or a 26-day month. Eligibility depends on the statutory definition of continuous service for each year claimed, and re-employment cases remain covered where service ends after the Act came into force. Authorities may condone delay on sufficient cause, and prior payment of a lesser amount does not bar recovery of the statutory balance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>